Non-DeArmond products

Some pickups produced by other manufacturers are sometimes mistakenly assumed to have been manufactured by the Rowe Industries Inc./H. N. Rowe & Company/Rowe DeArmond Inc./DeArmond Inc./Tosh Electronics group of companies, all of Toledo, Ohio, USA.

A selection of the most common examples is shown below.  Identifying these pickups in this manner does not infer criticism on them in any way, but merely clarifies their origin.

This site would gratefully appreciate any information on this particular subject.

These pickups, shown here with a black top, but also available with either a chrome or white top, installed in some Guild guitars including the X-50 archtop, were not manufactured by DeArmond.  It is likely that they were manufactured by the same company that manufactured Guild’s chrome humbuckers, because the above pickup’s connections terminate in a very small insulated connector unit exposed on the underside of the pickup – the same arrangement as on Guild’s humbucker.

 

The three pickups above have been ascribed to Guild/DeArmond, but they are definitely not by DeArmond, as produced in Toledo, Ohio (B0574. Photos copyright The Bonfires Vintage – Kevin).

 

This single-coil pickup with non-adjustable individual pole-pieces is fitted in some Guild Guitars, and is sometimes referred to as the ‘Mickey Mouse’ pickup.  In Guild’s 1969 catalog, it is shown in a T-100D ‘Slim Jim’ guitar and is described as a Frequency-Tested’ pickup.

The two photos above show the pickguard from a Magnatone Zephyr guitar.  The pickups are similar to DeArmond’s when viewed from the front but when viewed from underneath, it is clear that they are not.

 

This pickup was fitted to a number of Kay guitars.  The cover and bezel were manufactured as one pressing.  The pickup is quite shallow, enabling it to be surface-mounted on a pickguard or recessed with the bezel hidden.  The date of manufacture was sometimes stamped in ink on the underside of the pickup.  Note the closeness of the two fixing holes to the pickup body proper.  Several cosmetic variations to the plain chrome top exist, including an embossed diamond pattern and a printed black and white pattern.

 

This pickup fitted to a Kay mandolin was manufactured by Kay.

 

 

The three pickup types above, found on a number of Japanese guitars, may have been manufactured by Teisco.  The combination of gold-filled slots and pole openings could lead to mistaken identity as DeArmond items.

Japanese pickup

This Japanese pickup is reminiscent of the DeArmond S-Grille and D-Grille pickups.

 

Two guitar pickups factory-fitted in some Kay guitars are not DeArmond.  Photos 1, 2 & 3 above show Kay’s ‘Speedbump’ guitar pickup.  Photo 4 shows a ‘Kleenex Box’ type pickup.  Their method of construction is very different to any DeArmond pickup seen to date.

 

The pickups in the two photos above appear quite similar to DeArmond’s  recessable version of the Model 210, and may be by Schaller

 

The pickup shown above, factory-fitted in a Harmony H55 Sovereign Jumbo acoustic guitar is a version of the Gibson P-13 pickup.  The four visible fixing screws help identify the pickup as such (photo copyright Francois Demont).

The pickup below shown in a Harmony H655 Sovereign Jumbo acoustic guitar is a version of a DeArmond adjustable pole-pieces pickup, such as Model 55. The two visible fixing screws inline with the pole-pieces help identify the pickup as such (photo copyright Francois Demont).

 

This attachable guitar pickup range shown below, suitable for installation in a flat-top round-hole guitar, branded DeArmond and labelled DeArmond Tone Boss, has recently been produced by Guild.

DeArmond reproduction pickups:

Some pickups have been produced by other manufacturers to at least visually resemble original DeArmond pickups.  A market for these items exists because of the high cost  of the originals.  Some of these pickups are shown below:

Repro S-Grille soapbar pickup:

This pickup has no visible rivets and is secured by two screws at opposite ends of the pickup, similar to a Fender Stratocaster pickup.  DeArmond’s version does not require a cutout, as it is surface-mounted, being fixed with either woodscrews through hollow rivets, with solid rivets through pickguard material, or fitted in a white or black bezel.  This pickup could be fitted neatly into a plastic pickguard.

Repro four-scroll (a.k.a.) Moustache pickup:

Note the two height adjustment screws which project into the guitar body below and the absence of two rivets between the poles.  This pickup has the same frame and fixing arrangement as the D-Grille pickup above.  It has has no visible rivets and is secured by two screws at opposite ends of the pickup, as shown.  The white plastic bezel differs from the DeArmond version, having the two holes in line with the pole-pieces’ axis.   The short ends of the bezel are curved.  The original bezel had chamfered edges all round.

 

The DeArmond range of guitars and basses was introduced by Fender in the 1990s.  One pickup from that range is shown below.

The above pickup is Fender’s Model 2K.  While the upper, normally visible part of the pickup is very similar in appearance to DeArmond’s Model 2000, the underside is very different.  ‘DeArmond’ is embossed into one end of this pickup and is visible when installed in an instrument.

Fender’s pickup uses one flat bar magnet positioned on each side of the poles, creating a similar magnetic field path to Gibson’s P-90 pickup.

 

Repro Model 1000 Rhythm Chief – Version 1:

This version is sold in chrome or gold finish, with a short neck-fixing arm but without controls box.  It is factory-fitted on some Guild archtops and is widely available.  Note that the pickup’s front insert states ‘DeArmond Rhythm Chief’.  DeArmond’s own pickup insert is shown below:

 

Version 2 by Swingmaster, Europe:

 

Repro Model 1100 Adjustable Rhythm Chief – Version 1:

 

This pickup  is sold in gold finish with a short neck-fixing arm but without controls box.  This pickup is widely available.  This pickup and the Repro Model 1000 Rhythm Chief – Version 1 (shown above) would appear to be from the same source.